User talk:KiloByte

Kosovo Blackbird

Hi, thanks for the message. While I don't doubt that your edit was in good faith, there were two problems.

Common Blackbird is a Featured Article, which amongst other things means that everything must be referenced to independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts.
I looked at the Kosovo article to see if there was a reference there, and there was. At first sight it looked plausible, linked to a website purportedly belonging to an academic. When I read the text, however, it was clearly written from a highly pro-Serbian viewpoint. That makes it unsuitable as a neutral reference, and also suggests that the origin of the name is not universally accepted, since he seems to imply that there is an alternative view that the name is of Albanian origin. The point of his page is to belittle that view.

You are welcome to add the sentence again if you can find an independent neutral reference Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:38, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy to accept what you say about the etymology, and I've now found a proper reference, so I'll put it back Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:23, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hazael (band)

The article Hazael (band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article about a non-notable band that fails WP:BAND and has been tagged as unreferenced for three and half years and as possibly not passing notability for almost three years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Aspects (talk) 16:14, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thor (Hazael album)

The article Thor (Hazael album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable album that fails WP:NALBUM and has been tagged as unreferenced for over three years. The band's article was recently deleted, so there is nowhere for this article to redirect/merge to.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Aspects (talk) 04:40, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hazael Thor.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hazael Thor.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 21:22, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Comforter

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! HGilbert (talk) 23:57, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dopefish, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RAGE. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RE: XScreenSaver revert

Good morning; I have responded to your message on my talk page. -- 90.194.174.18 (talk) 08:50, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page Trump (disambiguation). However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation dos and don'ts, you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
- Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references

Thank you. Widefox; talk 17:50, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, KiloByte. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Allasch

The article Allasch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced. Makes no claim for notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:09, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bogus IP block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

KiloByte (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. 2001:470::/32 belongs to HE, they provide IPv6 connections to individual users. They also reveal users' data up to town level (check whois 2001:470:64f4::6). I've switched from SiXXS to HE in May and successfully edited Wikipedia since. KiloByte (talk) 9:11 pm, July 20, 2017, Thursday (UTC−5)

Accept reason:

The block has been lifted and you should be able to edit now. Katie^talk 14:03, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Servo logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Servo logo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 00:45, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, KiloByte. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cytopyge listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cytopyge. Since you had some involvement with the Cytopyge redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. PamD 22:07, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANSI Escapes—SGR param 21 (Bold Off)

I changed your a reversion a bit and added a citation with some info on the talk page. Tried to find a good middle ground and left the subjective out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ASiplas (talk • contribs) 21:21, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, KiloByte. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Servo logo and license

Hello. A few days ago I created a new article about Servo, the browser engine. One of things that is worth to place in infobox is a logo. Fortunately someone — you — already uploaded the Servo logo, so me and other users don't have to upload it to use it. Unfortunately you didn't specify the license for this file (look into section ″Image without license″ on your user talk) and therefore it can be used only on English Wikipedia, which is kinda useless since it's distributed under a free license (more specifically under the Mozilla Public License). Could you specify the license for that file, please?

P.S. If you would like to reply on my user talk, please use that one on Polish Wikipedia instead. GregX21 (talk) 13:50, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your fast response. Do you know if files uploaded on Wikipedia are automatically transferred to Wikimedia Commons? I'm just asking :) Additionally this web page says something like this:

A file uploaded to Commons only has to be uploaded and maintained once, as opposed to dozens of times for each individual Wiki.

Does it mean that if you uploaded a file e.g. on English Wikipedia, other wikis can't use it? It seems that's why I don't have the ability to use it on the Polish Wikipedia. And I wasn't right before, when I talked about a license. GregX21 (talk) 22:00, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Servo logo.png

The file File:Servo logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

contains copyrighted elements

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Okovita

The article Okovita has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not of note, article lacks sources, low-effort article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Newmonkeycrew (talk) 03:19, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Mellk (talk) 10:04, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Namers of Things and their Gatekeepers

hi) i noticed your comment about Muscovite (disambiguation) on our dear Mellk's talk page:

>Hi! You keep reverting edits to Muscovite (disambiguation) and other such pages, apparently claiming the names of Muscovy and so are not proper. Care to explain why? The name is somewhat dated today, but before 18th century it was primary label. (initial rename in early 18th century, a ban for the old name by late 18th by tzaress Catherine). Thus, the name is valid both because: 1. lingering historic usage today, 2. references to earlier periods. -KiloByte (talk) 13:00, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

while no doubt our dear Mellk has done plenty of good work on WP (and for this i am grateful)) they seem also to love to revert and undo others' work, including reverting and undoing work that furthers the mission of the project. in the spirit of that mission, do we have credible sources to support the claims:

- that the term Muscovite was not only a term that foreigners used to refer to inhabitants of Muscovy

(in other words was only an exonym or was it also an endonym or both or neither)

- that the term Muscovite was banned by Catherine (the 1st or 2nd?) by the late 18th century

also the term Moskal (disambiguation). what information do we have on the historical and contemporary usage of this term?

thanks again) ~ Johnfreez (talk) 20:21, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]